He also has accused Omaha of calling him a cheat, and acts insulted anyone could do such a thing.
Heh, so funny.
At first I felt bad he would think I was questioning his honesty, integrity & sense of fair play.
But then I started to recall our recent conversation that apparently sparked this vicious outburst from our "esteemed" Commish.
I pointed out to him that we had a very competitive battle for this year's cherished Chappie Award. I made it a special point to mention his unquestionable honesty, integrity & sense of fair play, and that surely everyone, even Deland who questions everyone's character, would concede our Commish has these required qualities.
But what if I'm wrong? What if our Commish wins the Chappie again this year? Would some disgruntled losers point out the fact that the Commish gets to see everyone else's picks prior to making his own.
I, for one, would feel terrible if our Commish's Chappie Award was tainted by even the silliest accusation that the winner had an unfair advantage.
So, to demonstrate his "honesty, integrity & sense of fair play," I suggested he recuse himself from his Commissioner's duties and have everyone send their picks to another player of high character and morals during the final, Super Bowl, week. I even nominated Kirk to assume this temporary duty on Super Bowl week since he has all the necessary character qualities and because he, well...is for all practical purposes out of the running.
Our esteemed Commish said he thought this was a great idea. But, true to form, he changed his mind by the next morning and
So our Commish has posted something that supposedly verifies he has already made his (invisible to us) picks. This is meaningless. When he posts the chart showing all of our picks, who's to say his published picks are the same as the unpublished ones supposedly verified by this generic (& blank) form above?
We are all insulted you thought you could get away with this scam.
Omaha
Senior Visible Member, SAC
Chief of Investigations
