Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Kevin Winning and the Logical Destruction of God

Based upon my readings of ancient Philosophy:

If God is willing to prevent Kevin from winning, but not able,
Then he is not omnipotent.


If God is able to prevent Kevin from winning, but not willing,
Then he is malevolent.


If God is both able and willing to prevent Kevin from winning,
Then why did he let Kevin win?


If God is neither able nor willing to prevent Kevin from winning,
Then why call him God?


(with apologies to Epicurus who wrote "evil" in place of "Kevin winning".